Supporting Without Policing: A Free Family Conversation Guide for the Phone-Ban Adjustment
Behavioural Addiction · Practice-informed · Practice-informed
A parent and carer-facing guide for shifting from policing a young person’s phone use to solving the problem together — a policing-versus-collaborating comparison, conversation starters, and a draft family phone agreement with a review date, written for the family conflict that often surfaces once a school phone ban puts device use under a spotlight at home too.
Underlying mechanism: Collaborative Problem-Solving for Family Phone Conflict
What it helps with
- Moving a family out of a confiscate-and-lecture cycle that tends to escalate rather than resolve conflict.
- Giving a parent specific wording for naming the shared problem instead of the behaviour.
- Producing a written family phone agreement both sides had a hand in, with a built-in review point.
How clinicians use it
- Use as a stand-alone handout, a joint session tool, or homework for the parent while the young person works through the client worksheets.
- Work toward the central shift: from confiscation and surveillance toward naming the shared problem and agreeing rules together.
- Set the review date 2-3 weeks out from the start, so the agreement is treated as adjustable rather than final.
Running the Family Conversation
- Name the shared problem before proposing any rule — a rule offered first sounds like a verdict already reached.
- Draft the agreement together in the same sitting, so neither side experiences it as handed down.
- Set the review date before ending the conversation; an agreement with no revisit point tends to quietly lapse.
What the worksheet looks like
| Policing move | Collaborating alternative |
|---|---|
| "Give me your phone, you’re always on it." | "The evening scrolling is affecting your sleep — can we figure this out together?" |
| Confiscating without warning | Agreeing a household rule together, with both signatures |
| Checking message history | Asking directly what is going on, and listening to the answer |
Clinical cautions
Not appropriate where there is a pattern of coercive control or domestic abuse, or where a parent’s own device rules are themselves part of a controlling dynamic — assess family safety before using this guide.
References
- Zhang, W., Li, Q., Chen, X., Zhu, Y., & Shi, X. (2025). Self-compassion mediates the relationship between family (but not peer) support and internet gaming disorder symptoms: a five-wave, random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Addictive Behaviors, 172, 108517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108517.
Part of
Screen Craving in the Phone-Ban Era
Related worksheets
Next steps
- Browse the full clinical resource library — every worksheet, free and printable.
- New worksheets, as they are published. One short email when a new evidence-based worksheet goes up — the sign-up form is at the foot of this page once it has finished loading. No client information, unsubscribe in one click.
- Membership for clinicians — Protocol Studio and the full toolkits, for when the free worksheets are not enough.